Jitu Patwari Accuses Shivraj Singh Chouhan of Oppressing Farmers Amid Fertiliser Shortages in Madhya Pradesh
Congress leader Jitu Patwari accuses Madhya Pradesh Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan of oppressing farmers amid fertiliser shortages, alleging long queues, baton charges, and administrative insensitivity, while urging farmers to become aware of their rights and demand accountability.
Addressing the issue in Bhopal, Patwari claimed that farmers are being forced to stand in long queues for fertilisers for hours, often through the day and night, only to face harsh treatment at distribution centres. He alleged that in several instances, farmers were subjected to baton charges, a situation he described as deeply unjust and reflective of administrative insensitivity. According to Patwari, such actions suggest that the government underestimates the awareness and resilience of the farming community.
The Congress leader asserted that the ongoing fertiliser distribution crisis has exposed serious flaws in the state’s agricultural management. He said that instead of ensuring timely and dignified access to essential supplies, the government has allowed circumstances where farmers are left exhausted, distressed, and vulnerable to coercive measures. Patwari framed the issue not only as a logistical failure but also as a moral one, accusing the leadership of disregarding the dignity of those who form the backbone of the rural economy.
Calling on farmers to recognise what he termed the “true face” of the current administration, Patwari urged them to become more vigilant about their rights and interests. He emphasised the need for collective awareness and accountability, suggesting that sustained pressure from the farming community is essential to prevent further exploitation and administrative excesses.
The allegations come at a sensitive time for Madhya Pradesh, where agriculture remains a central political and economic issue. With fertiliser availability and distribution frequently under scrutiny, Patwari’s remarks are likely to intensify the debate over governance, farmer welfare, and the state’s preparedness to support its agrarian population. As political exchanges sharpen, the controversy underscores the broader challenge of balancing administrative control with humane treatment in managing essential resources for farmers.

Comment List